2669 (China Overseas Property Holdings Ltd) vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong) Comparison

2669

Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

2669

Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Difference

1Y 3Y 5Y 10Y 15Y 20Y

2669

Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Add Stock

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

2669

CBRE

2423

JLL

Add Stock

1Y 3Y 5Y 10Y 15Y 20Y

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

China Overseas Property Holdings Ltd
Glance View

Market Cap

15.9B HKD

Industry

Real Estate

In the ever-evolving landscape of China’s booming real estate sector, China Overseas Property Holdings Ltd. stands as a prominent figure, weaving together a complex tapestry of property management services across the nation. Founded as a subsidiary of China Overseas Holdings Limited, a heavyweight in real estate development, China Overseas Property Holdings has carved out a niche, expertly navigating through both residential and commercial realms. With a keen eye for detail and a relentless commitment to quality, the company operates by managing an extensive portfolio of properties, from towering residential edifices to sprawling commercial complexes, ensuring that each asset under its care receives unparalleled service. This proficiency in property management isn’t just a backdrop for operations—it's the very stage on which the company orchestrates its financial performance. The engine driving China Overseas Property Holdings’ revenue model is primarily its fee-based services. The company deploys a seasoned workforce to handle everything from maintenance and repairs to security and landscaping, ensuring seamless and efficient operations. It receives compensation through management fees, typically structured as a fixed percentage of the property’s income or a flat rate for services rendered. Additionally, the company explores ancillary revenue streams through value-added services and leasing auxiliary spaces, such as parking facilities and advertising spots. This multi-pronged approach not only diversifies its income but also enhances customer satisfaction, positioning it as a key player in bolstering real estate value across China. Through this method, China Overseas Property Holdings Ltd. manages to maintain a robust and sustainable business model in the competitive landscape of China’s property management industry.

View China Overseas Property Holdings Ltd Analysis

Intrinsic Value

What is Intrinsic Value?

Economic Moat is a concept popularized by Warren Buffett to describe a company's durable competitive advantage. It represents the 'moat' that protects a company from competitors and helps it sustain profitability over the long term. Our analysis of the past 10 years showed that companies with a wide economic moat significantly outperformed the market, delivering +645% returns compared to +189% for the S&P 500.

Our research into Economic Moat performance spans the past 10 years and focuses on companies with a wide economic moat. For this analysis, we calculated the average stock price returns of these companies, comparing them to the performance of the S&P 500 index over the same period.

The results were compelling: wide moat stocks achieved a remarkable +645% average return, compared to +188% for the broader market. This difference highlights the long-term benefits of investing in businesses that can maintain their market position and pricing power over time.

Note: This research does not account for survivorship bias. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Determining whether a company has an economic moat requires both a deep dive into financial metrics and a qualitative assessment of its competitive position. Our analysts conduct a rigorous evaluation that focuses on identifying structural advantages that enable a company to sustain profitability and defend its market share over the long term.

The process begins with an analysis of a company’s historical financial performance. We assess how consistently the company has generated returns above its cost of capital and whether those returns have been stable or improving. However, financial performance alone doesn’t reveal the full picture. To understand the sources of these advantages, we evaluate five key drivers of economic moats:

Network Effect: We analyze whether the value of a company’s product or service grows as its user base expands. Platforms like payment systems or marketplaces benefit from this self-reinforcing.

Switching Costs: We assess whether customers face significant costs or disruptions when switching to a competitor’s product or service. High switching costs create customer stickiness and provide pricing power.

Intangible Assets: Strong brands, patents, and regulatory licenses can protect a company’s market position by creating barriers for competitors or enabling premium pricing. For example, a well-recognized consumer brand may command higher customer loyalty and margins.

Efficient scale: Occurs when a market is optimally served by one or a few players, making it unprofitable for new entrants to compete. This typically happens in industries with high fixed costs or geographic constraints, such as utilities or pipelines.

Cost Advantage: Companies with structural cost advantages can produce goods or services at a lower cost than their competitors, enabling them to offer competitive pricing or maintain higher margins. These advantages often arise from economies of scale, superior supply chain management, or proprietary technology. Firms like Walmart leverage their massive scale to negotiate better terms with suppliers, allowing them to undercut competitors on price.

By examining these factors in combination with a company’s financial performance and market positioning, we classify each company into one of three categories:

This rigorous evaluation ensures that our moat ratings are both comprehensive and reliable, giving investors the tools they need to make well-informed, long-term decisions.

US		CBRE Group Inc NYSE:CBRE	Add
CN	K	Ke Holdings Inc HKEX:2423	Add
US		Zillow Group Inc NASDAQ:ZG	Add
US		Jones Lang LaSalle Inc NYSE:JLL	Add
CA		FirstService Corp TSX:FSV	Add
CA		Colliers International Group Inc TSX:CIGI	Add
UK		Cushman & Wakefield PLC NYSE:CWK	Add
US	C	Compass Inc NYSE:COMP	Add
US		Newmark Group Inc NASDAQ:NMRK	Add
JP		Relo Group Inc TSE:8876	Add

US		CBRE Group Inc NYSE:CBRE	Select
CN	K	Ke Holdings Inc HKEX:2423	Select
US		Zillow Group Inc NASDAQ:ZG	Select
US		Jones Lang LaSalle Inc NYSE:JLL	Select
CA		FirstService Corp TSX:FSV	Select
CA		Colliers International Group Inc TSX:CIGI	Select
UK		Cushman & Wakefield PLC NYSE:CWK	Select
US	C	Compass Inc NYSE:COMP	Select
US		Newmark Group Inc NASDAQ:NMRK	Select
JP		Relo Group Inc TSE:8876	Select

US		CBRE Group Inc NYSE:CBRE	Add
CN	K	Ke Holdings Inc HKEX:2423	Add
US		Zillow Group Inc NASDAQ:ZG	Add
US		Jones Lang LaSalle Inc NYSE:JLL	Add
CA		FirstService Corp TSX:FSV	Add
CA		Colliers International Group Inc TSX:CIGI	Add
UK		Cushman & Wakefield PLC NYSE:CWK	Add
US	C	Compass Inc NYSE:COMP	Add
US		Newmark Group Inc NASDAQ:NMRK	Add
JP		Relo Group Inc TSE:8876	Add

CA	A	Advance Lithium Corp XTSX:AALI	Add
US	G	GE Vernova LLC NYSE:GEV	Add
NL	N	Nepi Rockcastle NV JSE:NRP	Add
US		Schlumberger NV NYSE:SLB	Add
US	B	Baker Hughes Co NASDAQ:BKR	Add
ID		Amman Mineral Internasional Tbk PT IDX:AMMN	Add
US	R	Reddit Inc NYSE:RDDT	Add
CH	G	Galderma Group AG SIX:GALD	Add
US		Halliburton Co NYSE:HAL	Add
IN		Jio Financial Services Ltd NSE:JIOFIN	Add

	Franklin Covey Co NYSE:FC	35.3 USD 0.17%
	Mohawk Industries Inc NYSE:MHK	118.28 USD 0.84%
	Ardmore Shipping Corp NYSE:ASC	12.56 USD -1.64%
	ASGN Inc NYSE:ASGN	86.92 USD 0.67%
	Skyworks Solutions Inc NASDAQ:SWKS	92.63 USD -0.03%
	Weatherford International PLC NASDAQ:WFRD	72.13 USD -3.57%

2669

vs

Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Stocks Performance
2669 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Performance Gap
2669 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Performance By Year
2669 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Competitors Performance
China Overseas Property Holdings Ltd vs Peers

China Overseas Property Holdings Ltd
Glance View

Company

Help

Tools

Stocks

	Johnson & Johnson NYSE:JNJ	142.27 USD -2.71%
	Bank of America Corp NYSE:BAC	46.21 USD 0.28%
	Mastercard Inc NYSE:MA	516.4 USD 0.98%
	Salesforce Inc NYSE:CRM	326.9 USD 0.61%
	Abbvie Inc NYSE:ABBV	178.5 USD -0.57%
	Home Depot Inc NYSE:HD	387.2 USD 0.77%

	Arista Networks Inc NYSE:ANET	115.51 USD 0.19%
	Visa Inc NYSE:V	312.6 USD 0.3%
	Texas Pacific Land Corp NYSE:TPL	1 275.94 USD 1.4%
	KLA Corp NASDAQ:KLAC	686.2 USD -0.45%
	Manhattan Associates Inc NASDAQ:MANH	272.49 USD 1.6%
	Pinduoduo Inc NASDAQ:PDD	100.32 USD -0.3%

	Salesforce Inc NYSE:CRM	326.9 USD 0.61%
	ServiceNow Inc NYSE:NOW	1 049.08 USD -0.48%
	EOG Resources Inc NYSE:EOG	128.46 USD 0.71%
	Copart Inc NASDAQ:CPRT	56.78 USD 0.96%
	Applied Materials Inc NASDAQ:AMAT	176.99 USD -0.47%
	Synopsys Inc NASDAQ:SNPS	502 USD 2.95%

	Johnson & Johnson NYSE:JNJ	142.27 USD -2.71%
	Berkshire Hathaway Inc NYSE:BRK.A	677 925 USD -0.09%
	Bank of America Corp NYSE:BAC	46.21 USD 0.28%
	Mastercard Inc NYSE:MA	516.4 USD 0.98%
	UnitedHealth Group Inc NYSE:UNH	524.52 USD 2%
	Exxon Mobil Corp NYSE:XOM	106.93 USD -1.67%

2669 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Stocks Performance 2669 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Performance Gap 2669 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Performance By Year 2669 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Competitors Performance China Overseas Property Holdings Ltd vs Peers

China Overseas Property Holdings Ltd Glance View

Company

Help

Tools

Stocks

2669

vs

Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Stocks Performance
2669 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Performance Gap
2669 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Performance By Year
2669 vs Hang Seng (Hong Kong)

Competitors Performance
China Overseas Property Holdings Ltd vs Peers

China Overseas Property Holdings Ltd
Glance View